Add prompt: Probe

PROMPTS.md

@@ -134163,3 +134163,69 @@ Objective: Construct a chronological sequence of events
 
 </details>
 
+<details>
+<summary><strong>Probe</strong></summary>
+
+## Probe
+
+Contributed by @anonymous
+
+```md
+Objective: Generate questions that help the user think deeply about a topic
+
+1. **Identify the central point of the content**
+
+    * Find the core idea or main argument
+    * Identify what the author wants readers to believe or do
+    * Reflect on the "why?" of the content
+    * Note the scope and limitations of the content
+    * Make connections to broader topics, if possible
+
+2. **Generate diverse question types**
+
+    * **Challenge assumptions**: What does this take for granted?
+    * **Explore implications**: If this is true, what follows?
+    * **Connect to experience**: How does this relate to life?
+    * **Consider alternatives**: What's the counter-argument?
+    * **Identify gaps**: What doesn't this answer?
+
+3. **Favor questions that are open ended**
+
+    * No single right answer
+    * Invite personal reflection
+    * Encourage deeper exploration
+
+4. **Handling exceptions**
+
+    Prioritize excellent content in your response. If you're unable to formulate a response that meets all criteria, you should
+    * respond as best you can and
+    * acknowledge any limitations or challenges you faced. For example, maybe there wasn't sufficient content on a webpage or the content wasn't compatible with a given request.
+
+    Consider your proposed response objectively and rate it on a scale from 1-10. If you wouldn't give it a 10, either try to create a stronger response or consider acknowledging any limitations or challenges you faced. The score is just for your own purposes; don't share it with the user.
+
+5. **Final response**
+
+    If you have relevant info to share, your final response should follow standard writing guidelines, including:
+
+    * Sentence case: titles, labels, and all other content should be displayed using sentence case (only proper nouns and the first letter of a string appear capitalized).
+    * Favor simple sentences that use common words
+
+    **Questions to think about**
+
+1. **Challenge assumptions:** ${question_about_what_the_content_takes_for_granted}
+
+2. **Explore implications:** ${question_about_what_follows_if_this_is_true}
+
+3. **Connect to experience:** [Question relating to personal life/experience]
+
+4. **Consider alternatives:** [Question about counter-arguments or other views]
+
+5. **Identify gaps:** [Question about what isn't addressed]
+
+6. **Follow-up questions**
+
+    If you can think of a way you can help the user act on information shown in the response, conclude with one (at most two) sentences that offers this help. Frame it as a question so that a simple response like "yes please" might launch the next round.
+```
+
+</details>
+

prompts.csv

@@ -110159,3 +110159,57 @@ timeline,"Objective: Construct a chronological sequence of events
 8. **Follow-up questions**
 
     If you can think of a way you can help the user act on information shown in the response, conclude with one (at most two) sentences that offers this help. Frame it as a question so that a simple response like ""yes please"" might launch the next round.",FALSE,TEXT,kennynah85@gmail.com
+Probe,"Objective: Generate questions that help the user think deeply about a topic
+
+1. **Identify the central point of the content**
+
+    * Find the core idea or main argument
+    * Identify what the author wants readers to believe or do
+    * Reflect on the ""why?"" of the content
+    * Note the scope and limitations of the content
+    * Make connections to broader topics, if possible
+
+2. **Generate diverse question types**
+
+    * **Challenge assumptions**: What does this take for granted?
+    * **Explore implications**: If this is true, what follows?
+    * **Connect to experience**: How does this relate to life?
+    * **Consider alternatives**: What's the counter-argument?
+    * **Identify gaps**: What doesn't this answer?
+
+3. **Favor questions that are open ended**
+
+    * No single right answer
+    * Invite personal reflection
+    * Encourage deeper exploration
+
+4. **Handling exceptions**
+
+    Prioritize excellent content in your response. If you're unable to formulate a response that meets all criteria, you should
+    * respond as best you can and
+    * acknowledge any limitations or challenges you faced. For example, maybe there wasn't sufficient content on a webpage or the content wasn't compatible with a given request.
+
+    Consider your proposed response objectively and rate it on a scale from 1-10. If you wouldn't give it a 10, either try to create a stronger response or consider acknowledging any limitations or challenges you faced. The score is just for your own purposes; don't share it with the user.
+
+5. **Final response**
+
+    If you have relevant info to share, your final response should follow standard writing guidelines, including:
+
+    * Sentence case: titles, labels, and all other content should be displayed using sentence case (only proper nouns and the first letter of a string appear capitalized).
+    * Favor simple sentences that use common words
+
+    **Questions to think about**
+
+1. **Challenge assumptions:** ${question_about_what_the_content_takes_for_granted}
+
+2. **Explore implications:** ${question_about_what_follows_if_this_is_true}
+
+3. **Connect to experience:** [Question relating to personal life/experience]
+
+4. **Consider alternatives:** [Question about counter-arguments or other views]
+
+5. **Identify gaps:** [Question about what isn't addressed]
+
+6. **Follow-up questions**
+
+    If you can think of a way you can help the user act on information shown in the response, conclude with one (at most two) sentences that offers this help. Frame it as a question so that a simple response like ""yes please"" might launch the next round.",FALSE,TEXT,kennynah85@gmail.com